It's been a subject of debate for years...should teams like the Washington Redskins change their name as to not reflect the Native American culture ??? I remember being at the Bills-Redskins Super Bowl in Minnesota in January of 1992 and a group of Native Americans were protesting the Redskins name outside the Metrodome at the time so it's been going on for years and quite frankly, nothing has changed. A few colleges changed their names...IUP became the Crimson Hawks, Rutgers became the Scarlet Knights but the Redskins, Indians, Braves, Warriors, etc remain the same. I don't think it's a big deal, the name itself, but the emblems and logos....that's another story. Do you really think the Chief Wahoo Indians logo is flattering ??? A red faced, big teeth, obnoxious looking thing. C'mon, it's ugly and repulsive and yet, for some reason, the Indians are getting a pass, at least from national attention, for it. I say, get rid of all of them...across the board !! You have animals (Huskies, Bulldogs, Bisons, etc) and geographical tie-ins (Phillies, Grape Pickers, Canucks, etc.) You have innate objects (Thunder, Clippers, Maple Leafs etc.) and they are harmless. One other worth mentioning....how about having your team named after a bunch of sea-bearing criminals ??? Like the Pirates. Where does that one fit in ???